September 30, 2008
The interview missed by Nate
Categories: Blog
by Romain
It's a bit naughty as the title but I think he unwittingly invented (it is often the case) a new style of interview: the interview failed.
It must still admit that I was a little luckier than Gonzaga, a victim of the camera mode disco (I quote). Poor Nate title: Interview with QUALITY ...
In short, I let you enjoy:
Joking aside, this interview was an opportunity to meet a promising young blogger. Go ask your interview failed to Nate.
September 30, 2008 at 18:44
September 30, 2008 at 19:07
And I, when he interview me, Nate?
September 30, 2008 at 19:16
Schmoove ??!!! But now you're crazy or what?
September 30, 2008 at 19:31
Simply magical ...
September 30, 2008 at 22:18
@ Babbling: request
@ Guillaume: It took me by surprise lol: $. Yes I am ashamed
September 30, 2008 at 23:40
So normally it's my turn? Cooooool!
October 1, 2008, 11:23
I just received an email from him.
I hesitate ..
October 1, 2008 at 11:31
For info: for you life easier when you multiply any number by 9 it will just multiply by 10 (by adding a zero behind the figure multiplied) and to subtract the same number multiplied.
9 x 9 =?
9 × 10 = 90
90 -9 = 81
9 X 9 = 81
@ +
Twistan
October 1, 2008 at 11:34
Haaaaaan!
You know your multiplication tables! The hoooooonte!
October 1, 2008 at 23:41
Let talk about your jeans really Roman.
October 2, 2008 at 14:36
Now it is whether Roman really loves "the little Marseilles" and "Ushuaia"? The same applies to brands of clothing that stops product placement?
I say that I say nothing